View Source

Below are notes from a cursory review of OpenShift in light of .

Account provisioning model based on region suggests services similar to AWS, GCE, Azure. Unclear why I'd choose OpenShift as a separate service, unless installing locally. If it's trying to be Heroku, it has competition in this space from Deis.

National Data Service > Revisiting OpenShift > Screen Shot 2017-10-16 at 11.36.28 AM.png

National Data Service > Revisiting OpenShift > Screen Shot 2017-10-16 at 11.37.32 AM.png

Projects appear to be directly related to Kubernetes namespaces.

National Data Service > Revisiting OpenShift > Screen Shot 2017-10-16 at 11.37.48 AM.png

National Data Service > Revisiting OpenShift > Screen Shot 2017-10-16 at 11.38.02 AM.png

Application catalog is still sparse – primarily development environments, CI and databases.

National Data Service > Revisiting OpenShift > Screen Shot 2017-10-16 at 11.38.39 AM.png

National Data Service > Revisiting OpenShift > Screen Shot 2017-10-16 at 11.39.43 AM.png

Users can paste their own JSON/YAML, which will largely be Kubernetes format.

National Data Service > Revisiting OpenShift > Screen Shot 2017-10-16 at 11.38.54 AM.png

National Data Service > Revisiting OpenShift > Screen Shot 2017-10-16 at 11.39.02 AM.png

National Data Service > Revisiting OpenShift > Screen Shot 2017-10-16 at 11.39.57 AM.png

National Data Service > Revisiting OpenShift > Screen Shot 2017-10-16 at 11.40.11 AM.png

Dashboard is nice, but the concepts are all straight from Kubernetes – Pods, Services, etc.

National Data Service > Revisiting OpenShift > Screen Shot 2017-10-16 at 11.40.31 AM.png

There appear to be a few additional items, such as builds and monitoring

National Data Service > Revisiting OpenShift > Screen Shot 2017-10-16 at 11.41.14 AM.png

National Data Service > Revisiting OpenShift > Screen Shot 2017-10-16 at 11.42.00 AM.png

National Data Service > Revisiting OpenShift > Screen Shot 2017-10-16 at 11.42.18 AM.png