You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

This page is intended to capture information related to NDS-211 - Getting issue details... STATUS .


Related 

 

Approved and Recommended Repositories

 

Publishers, funding agencies, research/domain organizations, and libraries often provide lists of recommended or supported repositories for depositing research data.  The motivations and requirements are often different, but the lists themselves might serve as the basis for our requirements analysis. We can review these (and other) lists to determine the factors in recommending data repositories to researchers.

 

NIH:

 

 

Elsevier: 

 

 

Nature

 

 

PLOS

 

 

Libraries

 

 

Other

 

SEAD C3PR/Matchmaker

The SEAD Matchmaker is used to pair datasets to repositories. It was originally part of the SEAD Virtual Archive, which enabled automatic depositing of data into institutional repositories via OAIS Submission Information Packages (SIP).  The matchmaker is now part of the SEAD 2.0 C3PR service (https://github.com/Data-to-Insight-Center/sead2/tree/master/sead-matchmaker).  Repositories can register with C3PR, providing information including accepted data types, maximum collection depth, maximum dataset size, minimum metadata fields, affiliations, and global identifier requirements. These are to some extent technical requirements.

See also:

Registries of Research Data Repositories

Researcher identifiers

  • ORCID: Persistent digital identifier for researchers – might be helpful in collecting researcher profile information for recommendation. ORCID doesn't appear to have a field.

Analysis

Reviewing the above lists and registries, we can identify factors in the recommendation of repositories to researchers:

FactorDescription
Funding agency approvalFunding agencies (e.g. NIH) have lists of approved repositories
Researcher communitiesSome repositories restrict to researchers in certain communities
Publisher integrationPublishers (e.g., Elsevier) have arrangements with repositories (e.g., bi-directional linking)
DomainRepositories are often restricted by domain, with some generalist services
Technical restrictionsSize
Community mandatesSome research communities have mandated repositories (see Nature list)
Data type

Some repositories are restricted to specific types of data. These criteria vary, for example:

    • Protein structures
    • Human or non-human derived
    • Phenotypes

Data types are often directly related to domain/field of study.

Metadata formatSome repositories are restricted to specific types of metadata (e.g., MIAME)

 

 

Use cases

 

 



  • No labels