Build: #275 failed
Job: Build and test failed
doubly nested subworkflow sub sub: Test case result
The below summarizes the result of the test " doubly nested subworkflow sub sub" in build 275 of Kurator - YesWorkflow - Build and test.
- Description
- doubly nested subworkflow sub sub
- Test class
- org.yesworkflow.graph.TestDotGrapher_ProcessView
- Method
- test_DoublyNestedSubworkflow_SubSub
- Duration
- < 1 sec
- Status
- Failed (New Failure)
Error Log
junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<...x_inner { label=""; [color=white /* Style for nodes representing atomic programs in workflow */ node[shape=box style=filled fillcolor="#CCFFCC" peripheries=1 fontname=Courier] /* Nodes representing atomic programs in workflow */ program4 program5 /* Style for edges representing channels between programs in workflow */ edge[fontname=Helvetica] /* Edges representing channels between programs in workflow */ program4 -> program5 [label=channel6] /* End of double cluster for drawing box around nodes in workflow */ }} /* Hidden double-cluster for grouping workflow input ports */ subgraph cluster_input_ports_group_outer { label=""; color=white subgraph cluster_input_ports_group_inner { label=""; color=white /* Style for nodes representing workflow input ports */ node[shape=circle style=filled fillcolor="#FFFFFF" peripheries=1 fontname=Courier width=0.2] /* Nodes representing workflow input ports */ channel4_input_port [label=""] /* End of double-cluster for grouping workflow input ports */ }} /* Hidden double-cluster for grouping workflow output ports */ subgraph cluster_output_ports_group_outer { label=""; color=white subgraph cluster_output_ports_group_inner { label=""; color=white] /* Style for nodes...> but was:<...x_inner { label=""; [penwidth=0 /* Style for nodes representing atomic programs in workflow */ node[shape=box style=filled fillcolor="#CCFFCC" peripheries=1 fontname=Courier] /* Nodes representing atomic programs in workflow */ program4 program5 /* Style for edges representing channels between programs in workflow */ edge[fontname=Helvetica] /* Edges representing channels between programs in workflow */ program4 -> program5 [label=channel6] /* End of double cluster for drawing box around nodes in workflow */ }} /* Hidden double-cluster for grouping workflow input ports */ subgraph cluster_input_ports_group_outer { label=""; penwidth=0 subgraph cluster_input_ports_group_inner { label=""; penwidth=0 /* Style for nodes representing workflow input ports */ node[shape=circle style=filled fillcolor="#FFFFFF" peripheries=1 fontname=Courier width=0.2] /* Nodes representing workflow input ports */ channel4_input_port [label=""] /* End of double-cluster for grouping workflow input ports */ }} /* Hidden double-cluster for grouping workflow output ports */ subgraph cluster_output_ports_group_outer { label=""; penwidth=0 subgraph cluster_output_ports_group_inner { label=""; penwidth=0] /* Style for nodes...> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<...x_inner { label=""; [color=white /* Style for nodes representing atomic programs in workflow */ node[shape=box style=filled fillcolor="#CCFFCC" peripheries=1 fontname=Courier] /* Nodes representing atomic programs in workflow */ program4 program5 /* Style for edges representing channels between programs in workflow */ edge[fontname=Helvetica] /* Edges representing channels between programs in workflow */ program4 -> program5 [label=channel6] /* End of double cluster for drawing box around nodes in workflow */ }} /* Hidden double-cluster for grouping workflow input ports */ subgraph cluster_input_ports_group_outer { label=""; color=white subgraph cluster_input_ports_group_inner { label=""; color=white /* Style for nodes representing workflow input ports */ node[shape=circle style=filled fillcolor="#FFFFFF" peripheries=1 fontname=Courier width=0.2] /* Nodes representing workflow input ports */ channel4_input_port [label=""] /* End of double-cluster for grouping workflow input ports */ }} /* Hidden double-cluster for grouping workflow output ports */ subgraph cluster_output_ports_group_outer { label=""; color=white subgraph cluster_output_ports_group_inner { label=""; color=white] /* Style for nodes...> but was:<...x_inner { label=""; [penwidth=0 /* Style for nodes representing atomic programs in workflow */ node[shape=box style=filled fillcolor="#CCFFCC" peripheries=1 fontname=Courier] /* Nodes representing atomic programs in workflow */ program4 program5 /* Style for edges representing channels between programs in workflow */ edge[fontname=Helvetica] /* Edges representing channels between programs in workflow */ program4 -> program5 [label=channel6] /* End of double cluster for drawing box around nodes in workflow */ }} /* Hidden double-cluster for grouping workflow input ports */ subgraph cluster_input_ports_group_outer { label=""; penwidth=0 subgraph cluster_input_ports_group_inner { label=""; penwidth=0 /* Style for nodes representing workflow input ports */ node[shape=circle style=filled fillcolor="#FFFFFF" peripheries=1 fontname=Courier width=0.2] /* Nodes representing workflow input ports */ channel4_input_port [label=""] /* End of double-cluster for grouping workflow input ports */ }} /* Hidden double-cluster for grouping workflow output ports */ subgraph cluster_output_ports_group_outer { label=""; penwidth=0 subgraph cluster_output_ports_group_inner { label=""; penwidth=0] /* Style for nodes...> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:100) at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:107) at junit.framework.TestCase.assertEquals(TestCase.java:269) at org.yesworkflow.graph.TestDotGrapher_ProcessView.test_DoublyNestedSubworkflow_SubSub(TestDotGrapher_ProcessView.java:115) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:176) at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:141) at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:122) at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:142) at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:125) at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:129) at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:255) at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:250) at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit38ClassRunner.run(JUnit38ClassRunner.java:84) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:252) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:112) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:115) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:75)