Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

(a) Dirichlet (mu)(b) RM3 (fbOrigWeight)(c) PubMed RM3 (fbOrigWeight)(d) Wikiepdia RM3 (fbOrigWeight)


So, the next step is to see In each of these cases, the fbOrigWeight that controls the mixing of the original and feedback query is relatively fixed – learned on average from the training queries. We can explore whether we can reliably predict when to apply one model or another or the other. 

...

to predict the fbOrigWeight mixing parameter via query performance prediction methods.

Query performance prediction


Adaptive feedback

One approach explored by Lv and Zhai (2009) is to learn a model to predict the expansion mixing weight. They found six features to be predictive of the feedback weight in a linear model:

  • Divergence (QFBDiv_A): KL-divergence of query and feedback documents
  • Query clarity (QEnt_R1): Relative entropy of the query compared to the collection
  • Log query clarity (QEnt_R3): Log of the relative entropy of the query compared to the collection
  • Feedback radius (FBRadius): average divergence between each document and the centroid of the feedback documents.
  • Exponentiated feedback clarity (FBEnt_R2): Exponentiated relative entropy of feedback documents to the collection
  • Topic model clarity (FBEnt_R3): Relative entropy of the feedback document topic model to the collection.

All of these predictors are post-retrieval predictors, some with significant overhead.


References

Lv, Y., & Zhai, C. (2009). Adaptive Relevance Feedback in Information Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 255–264). New York, NY, USA: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/1645953.1645988